The Xeon E5-2609 is a slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 5700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 5700X
- A faster gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-2609
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than the Xeon E5-2609 – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than the Xeon E5-2609 – 16 vs 4 threads
Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5700X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
166
82%
Min 1% FPS
112
84%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 5700X
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
133
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5700X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5700X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700X
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-2609 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Not Available | MSRP | $299.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
80 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |