Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3422 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 40% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 158 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 7600
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
