In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-1620 is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-12600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620
No clear advantages
Core i5-12600KF
- Up to 81% faster in Battlefield 6 – 112 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 81% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i5-12600KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
62 FPS
55%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
55%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.74/FPS
100%
![Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B01EA1QY04.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i5-12600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i5-12600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
10 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12600KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12600KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $264.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
