The Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8150 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's £48.27 cheaper!
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 49% cheaper – £49.95 vs £98.22
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs FX-8150 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs FX-8150 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $294.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Zambezi |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
