The Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-10400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
The Core i5-10400F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-10400F
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i5-10400F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
96%
Min 1% FPS
120
97%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i5-10400F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
10 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$294.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |