Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 44% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 747 vs 518 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
747
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£307.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £307.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |