Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3403 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 383 vs 324 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
