In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1535M v5 is slower than the Ryzen 7 3700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 19% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Oct 27, 2015
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1535M v5 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
100%
Price, $
$198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1535M v5 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1535M v5 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1535M v5
Oct 27th, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1535M v5 Oct 27th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 3700X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 27th, 2015 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $623.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
