Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2674 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 30% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 163 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.7/FPS
100%
Price, £
£929.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £929.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |