Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2290 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1275 v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 15% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1275 v5 - 146 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 - 58 vs 80 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1275 v5 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |