Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4173 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 499 vs 379 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 77 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
