Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3504 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1260L - 164 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 24 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £204.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6900 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |