Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3503 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 80 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 30% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 158 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
£552.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £552.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |