Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4580 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 142% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E3-1225 - 605 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 32 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
605
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.72/FPS
100%
Price, £
£433.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |