Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E3-1220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4294 days newer than Xeon E3-1220.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 80% better in War Thunder than Xeon E3-1220 - 237 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 16 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon E3-1220
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1220 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
