Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3097 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1220 v2
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 69 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 25% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 146 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£203.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £203.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |