Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E-2388G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 483 days newer than Xeon E-2388G.
Advantages of Xeon E-2388G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E-2388G - 383 vs 382 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2388G | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
