Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E-2314 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 307 days older than Xeon E-2314.
Advantages of Xeon E-2314
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E-2314 - 385 vs 358 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 24 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
385
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£203.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £203.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2314 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |