Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1736 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of Xeon E-2176M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E-2176M - 130 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 16 vs 12 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E-2176M
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2176M | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
