Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 42 days older than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 205 vs 204 FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 58 vs 280 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
93%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Chagall | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |