Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 697 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 658 vs 577 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - £2511.32 vs £8448.46
- Up to 74% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - £3.82 vs £14.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
FPS
577
88%
Value, £/FPS
£14.64/FPS
26%
Price, £
£8448.46
29%
Buy for £8,448.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
658
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.82/FPS
100%
Price, £
£2511.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £2,511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |