Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 346 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 230 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - £295.00 vs £2798.00
- Up to 90% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - £1.28 vs £12.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 105 vs 280 Watts
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £2,798 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |