Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1126 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 280 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 48 vs 44 threads
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 145 vs 280 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
280
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1455
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,455 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 336 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 22 |
48 | Threads | 44 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 145 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |