Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 771 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £1455.00 vs £2511.32
- Up to 40% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-12400 - £10.54 vs £17.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 48 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 142 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
138
97%
Value, £/FPS
£10.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1455
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £1,455 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 304 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
142
100%
Value, £/FPS
£17.69/FPS
60%
Price, £
£2511.32
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 304 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |