Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 84 days older than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS - 147 vs 140 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Apr 19th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
6 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |