Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 1074 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10920X.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10920X - 220 vs 193 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10920X
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - £764.99 vs £929.89
- Up to 6% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7900X - £3.96 vs £4.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 165 vs 170 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.23/FPS
94%
Price, £
£929.89
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for £929.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8680 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
193
88%
Value, £/FPS
£3.96/FPS
100%
Price, £
£764.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £764.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8680 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Raphael | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 165 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |