The Ryzen 9 6900HX is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-13400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 6900HX
The Core i5-13400 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-13400
- A faster CPU for gaming
Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i5-13400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Jan 10th, 2022
Average FPS
198
97%
Min 1% FPS
131
97%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-13400
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
205
100%
Min 1% FPS
135
100%
Price, £
£176.27
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.85/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i5-13400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i5-13400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i5-13400 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Jan 10th, 2022
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i5-13400
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
94%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HX | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-13400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $221.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Rembrandt | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
| 16 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
