The Ryzen 9 3900X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-1620 v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 3900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
The Ryzen 9 3900X is better in every way
Ryzen 9 3900X vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
94%
Min 1% FPS
120
94%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 3900X vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
10 MB
16%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
$499.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Matisse | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
105 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
Performance | ||
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
64 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |