In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 3900X is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 3900X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
83%
L3 Cache
20 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X Jul 7th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$499.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1200 |
105 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
