Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Ryzen 7 4800H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1094 days newer than Ryzen 7 4800H.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 4800H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 4800H - 216 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 4800H - 32 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
216
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£568.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £568.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 4800H | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |