The Ryzen 7 2700X is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700X
The Core i9-10900F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 2700X
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
183
95%
Min 1% FPS
121
95%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
| 16 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
