In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 7 1700 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900KS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 7 1700
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 65 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i9-13900KS
- Up to 99% faster in Battlefield 6 – 137 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 99% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer – Jan 12, 2023 vs Mar 02, 2017
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i9-13900KS: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
137 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$751.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i9-13900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i9-13900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 1700
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
62%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 7 1700 Mar 2nd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KS Jan 12th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 2nd, 2017 | Released | Jan 12th, 2023 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
