Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1463 days newer than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 217 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS - 28 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 5 4600HS
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Core i7-14700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Renoir | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 20 |
| 12 | Threads | 28 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
