Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 4600G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 4600G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 238 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 4600G.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 4600G
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - £127.39 vs £366.66
- Up to 62% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-11900KF - £1.10 vs £2.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 5 4600G - 127 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 4600G - 16 vs 12 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
116
91%
Value, £/FPS
£1.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£127.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £127.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 425 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
127
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.89/FPS
38%
Price, £
£366.66
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for £366.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 425 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 4600G | vs | Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |