In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 5 3400G is slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 30% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
69 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
76%
Price, $
$88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 3400G Jul 7th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
