Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £104.39 vs £346.39
- Up to 66% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-13700K - £1.04 vs £3.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 14% better in Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen 5 2600X - 114 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
100
88%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£104.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £104.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
114
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.04/FPS
34%
Price, £
£346.39
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for £346.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |