The Ryzen 5 2600 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320E. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 2600
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 2600 vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 5 2600 vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 2600 vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 2600 vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 2600 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| $1.99 | MSRP | $1.47 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Zen | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
