In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 5 2500X is quite a bit slower than the Core i3-12100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 5 2500X
No clear advantages
Core i3-12100F
- Up to 35% faster in Battlefield 6 – 97 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 35% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jan 13, 2022 vs Sep 10, 2018
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 58 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 2500X vs Core i3-12100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 2500X vs Core i3-12100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 2500X vs Core i3-12100F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 2500X
Sep 10th, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Core i3-12100F
Jan 13th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 2500X Sep 10th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12100F Jan 13th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2018 | Released | Jan 13th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
