Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 546 days newer than Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U - 127 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
127
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £169.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7123 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 7th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
May 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Graphics 320SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |