In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 3 3200G is slightly faster than the FX-4300. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $23 more expensive!
Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6 – 68 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
FX-4300
- Up to 35% cheaper – $42.94 vs $65.98
- Up to 35% cheaper
- Up to 28% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.70 vs $0.97/FPS
- Up to 28% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 3 3200G vs FX-4300: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
68 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.98
65%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
72%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
90%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G Jul 7th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | AM3+ |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
