Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1759 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-6700 - 258 vs 256 FPS
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - £116.22 vs £222.68
- Up to 48% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 3 3100 - £0.45 vs £0.86 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £222.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 628 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
256
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.45/FPS
100%
Price, £
£116.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £116.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 628 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |