Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 5077 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of Phenom II X4 810
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 20% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Phenom II X4 810 - 182 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Phenom II X4 810
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
