The Pentium G6950 is a much slower gaming CPU than the FX-8320E. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 73 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Pentium G6950 vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Pentium G6950
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
164
98%
Min 1% FPS
111
99%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Pentium G6950 vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium G6950 vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium G6950 vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium G6950
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
57%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Pentium G6950 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
$87.00 | MSRP | $147.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
73 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
