The Pentium 6805 is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-10400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Pentium 6805
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-10400
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Pentium 6805 vs Core i5-10400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Pentium 6805
Oct 1st, 2020
Average FPS
182
97%
Min 1% FPS
121
98%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, £
£123.9
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.66/FPS
100%
Pentium 6805 vs Core i5-10400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium 6805 vs Core i5-10400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium 6805 vs Core i5-10400 in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium 6805
Oct 1st, 2020
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
38%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Pentium 6805 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$161.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Ice Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
UHD Graphics (32EU) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |