Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3977 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 27% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon X5690 - 127 vs 100 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
127
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£193.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £193.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5690 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |