Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 2515 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 7% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon X5680 - 198 vs 185 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
