Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 4911 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- Performs up to 78% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon X5680 - 254 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Mobile • Jul 27th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Single-Core
530
18.81434149804757%
Multi-Core
2448
14.849863512283894%
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
