Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 4707 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 131% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon X5680 - 565 vs 245 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £382.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65286 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Single-Core
530
18.781006378454997%
Multi-Core
2448
14.005377882029865%
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |