Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 3430 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon X5680 - 220 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 24 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
