Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 5043 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon X5680 - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 28 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Single-Core
530
21.405492730210014%
Multi-Core
2448
23.15988647114475%
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
